|
A Question of Liability
In 1987 when I still lived
in England, a close friend of mine bought a lovely apartment for
£70,000 (€105,000). It was built in the 1960s and, on first
inspection, the building seemed to be in excellent condition. Part
of the reason for the premium price was the location on the bank of
the River Thames, in a very sought-after area within the commuter
belt, about 50km south west of London. The apartment was on the top
floor of six, with a panoramic view of the Thames - truly, her dream
home.
Less than a month later her
dream became a nightmare. Southern England was hit by the most
violent storm in living memory, with gusts of wind in excess of 100
mph (160 km/h). When the storm finally subsided, by friend's
apartment was wrecked. Where the roof had once been there was now a
huge gaping hole. Of the top floor apartments only two had roof
damage.
Whereas in Finland
individuals are protected by the umbrella of the Housing Company, in
England each individual apartment is the owner's own
responsibility. That is to say, if you live on the top floor, you
have sole responsibility for the roof above you. Consequently, my
unfortunate friend had no option but to pay out a further £5,000
(€7,000) for the roof repairs. Despite her unhappy experience,
however, I was thrilled to buy my first flat in Finland. Until
recently, I believed the Finnish system to be altruistic, with the
Housing Association taking shared responsibility with the owners for
property management and maintenance - now I am not so sure!
Last year, I decided to
purchase a second, larger apartment in the same building and to rent
my existing one. I was fortunate that a friend knew a lady who
wanted to rent an apartment in the Lahti area. Shortly afterwards,
in August 2005, the lady moved in. She was an ideal tenant - clean,
quiet and always paid her rent on time. She was happy, and I was
happy. That is until last December when she became ill with mild
bronchitis. The doctor said that the probable cause of this illness
was microbes in the apartment.
My tenant called the Housing
Administrator, not once but twice. He was not at all sympathetic,
and refused to come to check the apartment. Instead, he suggested
that she should open the window to increase ventilation.
Understandably dissatisfied, she then called Lahti City's
Environment Department, who came to test the air quality. Sure
enough, there was slight evidence of water damage and microbes both
in the kitchen and bedroom.
According to the Housing
Administrator the water had come either through an outside wall or
an open window, which means he is not responsible. This is a total
mystery to me. How can water come through an outside wall? And the
window has a metal frame outside specifically designed to prevent
such an occurrence. In February my tenant, who now kept the window
open, which had indeed improved the air quality, decided that in the
interest of her health it was better that she moved out.
When I complained to the
Housing Administrator that his inaction had led to my tenant moving
out, again he was unsympathetic stating, “your tenant was too
sensitive …………. the tester is an idiot”.
I have since discovered that
the parquet in the apartment had been laid on top of two layers of
plastic mats. A leaking roof which the Housing Association has been
slow to repair and a small leakage from the dishwasher resulted in
water being trapped between the mats and parquet.
The old parquet and two
layers of plastic mats have now been removed from the entire
apartment; the floor disinfected; and a new single layer of laminate
laid. The floor is now microbe free. However, because the
environmental health office was called in, and by law I am required
to declare as such, several potential buyers, have been deterred
from actually buying the apartment. The Housing Administrator
remains intransigent.
I wonder if anyone else has
had a similar experience?
Mike Bangle is the owner of
Talking English language consultancy and can be contacted at mike.bangle(at)phnet.fi
Word List
liability |
vastuu |
river bank |
joenpenger |
sought after |
olla kysytty, haluttu |
commuter belt |
asumalähiövyöhyke |
gust of wind |
tuulenpuuska |
subside |
tyyntyä |
wreck |
raunioitunut |
gaping hole |
ammottava aukko |
sole |
ainoa |
option |
valinta, valinnan mahdollisuus |
altruistic |
epäitsekäs |
purchase |
osto, hankinta |
Housing Administrator |
taloyhtiön isännöitsijä |
environment |
ympäristö |
evidence |
todiste, todistusaineisto |
occurrence |
tapahtuma |
improve |
parantaa, kohentaa |
inaction |
toimettomuus |
deter (from) |
pidätellä, estää tekemästä jotakin |
intransigent |
tinkimätön, peräänantamaton |
|
|
|